banner
Home

Environmental Stress Screening

Environmental Stress Screening

  • Differences Between ESS and TC Differences Between ESS and TC
    Jan 22, 2026
    Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) and Temperature Cycling (TC) are widely used reliability verification methods for electronic products, differing significantly in core principles, stress types, and application scenarios. ESS is a multi-stress combined screening method. It efficiently identifies potential early-stage defects by applying multiple environmental stresses simultaneously, simulating the synergistic effects of real operating conditions. TC is a single-stress screening method. It accelerates the exposure of thermal expansion/contraction-related defects through periodic temperature variations. Key differences are as follows: 1. Stress Types & Defect Coverage l TC: Only applies temperature cycling stress (e.g., -55°C to +125°C). Thermal stress induced by differential material expansion/contraction detects defects directly linked to thermal matching, including solder joint fatigue, poor chip bonding, package cracks, and multi-layer dielectric splitting. l ESS: Adopts a multi-stress superimposition strategy, synchronously applying temperature cycling, random vibration, and electrical stress (e.g., dynamic voltage switching). This coupling effect effectively exposes complex failure modes such as structural loosening, poor connector contact, microcrack propagation, and intermittent conduction failure, especially intermittent faults hard to replicate under single-stress conditions. 2. Equipment Investment & Cost l TC: Requires only temperature test chambers, with low procurement costs, standardized operation, easy maintenance, minimal energy/labor consumption, and suitability for large-scale mass production deployment. l ESS: Demands an integrated test platform comprising temperature control systems, vibration tables, electrical stress loading modules, and high-precision monitoring systems. Initial investment typically exceeds RMB 1 million, with high-end configurations costing several million yuan. It imposes strict requirements on site, power supply, cooling systems, and technician expertise, leading to substantially higher operational costs. 3. Application Scenarios & Industry Requirements l TC: A routine screening method widely used in consumer electronics and industrial control equipment—fields sensitive to cost or with conventional reliability needs. l ESS: Boasting a high defect detection rate (60%–80% for intermittent faults), it is mandated by industry standards for high-reliability sectors including aerospace, automotive electronics, military equipment, and medical devices to ensure critical system functionality. 4. Screening Effectiveness l Studies indicate TC screens 75%–85% of defects, random vibration screens 15%–25%, while their combination (core of ESS) achieves a detection rate of up to 90%. l ESS’s multi-stress coupling better simulates real-world comprehensive stresses, enabling more thorough elimination of early-stage failures. 5. Lab Companion ESS & TC Test Chambers - Guangdong Lab Companion Co., Ltd. High efficiency guarantees quality, maximizing reliability assurance. Lab Companion ESS series complies with universal climatic test standards, offering chamber volumes from 270L to 1300L and a temperature range of -70°C to +180°C, meeting diverse customer needs. Optimal temperature change rates: 5K/min, 10K/min, 15K/min. Your product functionality remains intact throughout production, R&D, and quality assurance. Leave reliability testing to us.
    Read More
  • Accelerated Environmental Testing Technology
    Mar 21, 2025
    Traditional environmental testing is based on the simulation of real environmental conditions, known as environmental simulation testing. This method is characterized by simulating real environments and incorporating design margins to ensure the product passes the test. However, its drawbacks include low efficiency and significant resource consumption.   Accelerated Environmental Testing (AET) is an emerging reliability testing technology. This approach breaks away from traditional reliability testing methods by introducing a stimulation mechanism, which significantly reduces testing time, improves efficiency, and lowers testing costs. The research and application of AET hold substantial practical significance for the advancement of reliability engineering.   Accelerated Environmental Testing Stimulation testing involves applying stress and rapidly detecting environmental conditions to eliminate potential defects in products. The stresses applied in these tests do not simulate real environments but are instead aimed at maximizing stimulation efficiency.   Accelerated Environmental Testing is a form of stimulation testing that employs intensified stress conditions to assess product reliability. The level of acceleration in such tests is typically represented by an acceleration factor, defined as the ratio of a device's lifespan under natural operating conditions to its lifespan under accelerated conditions.   The stresses applied can include temperature, vibration, pressure, humidity (referred to as the "four comprehensive stresses"), and other factors. Combinations of these stresses are often more effective in certain scenarios. High-rate temperature cycling and broadband random vibration are recognized as the most effective forms of stimulation stress. There are two primary types of accelerated environmental testing: Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) and Reliability Enhancement Testing (RET).   Reliability Enhancement Testing (RET) is used to expose early failure faults related to product design and to determine the product's strength against random failures during its effective lifespan. Accelerated Life Testing aims to identify how, when, and why wear-out failures occur in products.   Below is a brief explanation of these two fundamental types.   1. Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) : Environmental Test Chamber Accelerated Life Testing is conducted on components, materials, and manufacturing processes to determine their lifespan. Its purpose is not to expose defects but to identify and quantify the failure mechanisms that lead to product wear-out at the end of its useful life. For products with long lifespans, ALT must be conducted over a sufficiently long period to estimate their lifespan accurately.   ALT is based on the assumption that the characteristics of a product under short-term, high-stress conditions are consistent with those under long-term, low-stress conditions. To shorten testing time, accelerated stresses are applied, a method known as Highly Accelerated Life Testing (HALT).   ALT provides valuable data on the expected wear mechanisms of products, which is crucial in today's market, where consumers increasingly demand information about the lifespan of the products they purchase. Estimating product lifespan is just one of the uses of ALT. It enables designers and manufacturers to gain a comprehensive understanding of the product, identify critical components, materials, and processes, and make necessary improvements and controls. Additionally, the data obtained from these tests instills confidence in both manufacturers and consumers.   ALT is typically performed on sampled products.   2. Reliability Enhancement Testing (RET) Reliability Enhancement Testing goes by various names and forms, such as step-stress testing, stress life testing (STRIEF), and Highly Accelerated Life Testing (HALT). The goal of RET is to systematically apply increasing levels of environmental and operational stress to induce failures and expose design weaknesses, thereby evaluating the reliability of the product design. Therefore, RET should be implemented early in the product design and development cycle to facilitate design modifications.     Researchers in the field of reliability noted in the early 1980s that significant residual design defects offered considerable room for reliability improvement. Additionally, cost and development cycle time are critical factors in today's competitive market. Studies have shown that RET is one of the best methods to address these issues. It achieves higher reliability compared to traditional methods and, more importantly, provides early reliability insights in a short time, unlike traditional methods that require prolonged reliability growth (TAAF), thereby reducing costs.
    Read More

leave a message

leave a message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.
submit

home

products

WhatsApp

contact us